速度与激情8

SC expresses concern over hate speeches made against minority communities_我的网站

A |     December 18, 2025, is shaping up to be an exciting date for Telugu cinema lovers. Two major film teasers are set to be released on the same day. Fans can look forward to first looks from films led by Vijay Deverakonda and Adivi Sesh, making the day extra special.          Teasers of Dacoit and Rowdy Janardhan     After the setback of Kingdom, Vijay Deverakonda is currently shooting for two projects, and Rowdy Janardhan is one of them. It is being directed by Ravi Kiran Kola, who earlier made Raja Vaaru Rani Gaaru. According to latest the buzz the teaser and official title will be unveiled at a grand event in Hyderabad. At the same time, the teaser of Adivi Sesh’s much-awaited action-drama Dacoit, will also be released on the same day. The film has been in production for almost two years. A separate event has been planned for its teaser launch in Mumbai and Hyderabad respectively. Dacoit, an action drama, follows an angry convict seeking vengeance against his former girlfriend who betrayed him. Earlier this year, in May, the filmmakers unveiled one minute teaser. The film revolves around betrayal and revenge.          Both films significant for lead actors     Dacoit is scheduled to release in theatres on March 19, 2025. Mrunal Thakur plays the female lead, while filmmaker Anurag Kashyap makes his Telugu debut in a powerful negative role. The film is directed by Shaneil Deo and mounted on a grand scale. Both films are significant for Sesh and Vijay. Rowdy Janardhan could be a turning point for Vijay Deverakonda, while Dacoit has the potential to take Adivi Sesh’s career to a new level. The special aspect is that both these films are being directed by newcomers, and all eyes are now on December 18, 2025, to see what they have lined up with these films.Also Read: Adivi Sesh and Mrunal Thakur’s Dacoit: Ek Prem Katha to Hit Theatres on Gudi Padwa and Eid Weekend。    New Delhi, Oct 21 (UNI) Expressing its serious concern over the way, some of the hate speeches were made against the minority communities during recent religious congregations, the Supreme Court questioned as to where we have reached, what have we reduced religion to?

"Where have we reached? What have we reduced religion to? What have we reduced God to? It is tragic," a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice K M Joseph and also comprising Justice Hrishikesh Roy, observed.

"The statements are certainly very shocking for a country that is to be religion neutral," the Supreme Court said, and expressed shock at some of the statements and hate speech made against minority communities during certain recent religious congregations.

The Apex Court was hearing a plea filed by the petitioner, Shaheen Abdullah, seeking urgent direction, interventions and or orders to stop the hate speeches made against the Muslim community.

"A country which is a democracy and religion neutral, you are saying it there should be action in IPC. But it's against one community. It is sad," the Supreme Court observed.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioner, Abdullah, presented a recent "Hindu Sabha" as an example where BJP MP from West Delhi, Parvesh Verma, called for the "total boycott" of "these people" apparently referring to Muslims.

The Supreme Court said, in its order that "the respondent (authorities) will issue directions to their subordinates in this regard without looking at the religion of the accused, so that the secular nature of India is preserved.*

The Supreme Court also in its order directed that the respective governments and police authorities should take suo motu action in cases of hate speeches and they should not wait for lodging of a formal complaint.

"Such action is needed to be taken to preserve secular character of the country," the Supreme Court observed and expressed its shock over the way the hate speeches are made.

Abdullah, the petitioner, said the Muslim community is being "targeted and terrorised" by the participation of the members of the ruling political party in delivering the hate speeches.

The Supreme Court in its order directed the Delhi, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand police to take Suo Motu cognizance action against any instance of hate speech in the State without waiting for a complaint to be filed.

The Supreme Court also made it clear that if there is a lack of action by the police and authorities, it will result in contempt of court against the concerned authority or person.

The Supreme Court also sought action taken report from Delhi police on alleged hate speeches made by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Member of Parliament, Parvesh Verma and others in Delhi on October 9 against Muslim community.

Sibal argued that we have filed many complaints. This Court or administration never takes action! Always status reports. These people are participating in events on daily basis.

"The Administration does nothing. We keep coming to Court," Sibal pleaded for action.

While reading the alleged speeches of Varma, the Court read, "If need be, we will slit their throats", (Bench reads). It said, it is very sad and tragic.

Sibal said, Yes, him and team. He is an MP of the party (BJP).

"We need an SIT (Special Investigation Team) to make sure that it doesn't get repeated," Sibal pleaded to the Supreme Court.

UNI SM SHK2105。

Current article:http://5d5s0.chuandanfozhuanbenglipaicuzi.pics/3z8eqw/20260826/7561.html

Published on:17:58:08